Quick Overview is up to date
Spend twenty minutes per week browsing Investment Tools and you will be better informed than most financial experts!
Problem with
these notes: some tend to run up against a deeply rooted feature of human
cognition - the desire not to think about anything unpleasant ... Sorry about that.
Because here is the thing. Every. Single. Journalist. who was there (and there were many, from major outlets all over Europe and the world) that I spoke to, said "myeditor refuses to print any story critical of economic growth." Every. Single. One.
Topics covered planetary
boundaries, trade, finance, fiscal policy, global South, decolonisation,
gender, justice, well-being, social policies. Every panel included major
advances in understanding. Together, the conference represents a monumental
coming of age of post-growth.
Prof Julia S. 🌍🌹🌱
#ClimateAction #FightFascism
@JKSteinberger
Comments regarding Musk’s Twitter ownership - from ChatGPT
The ownership structure of a platform like Twitter can have
several social implications, whether it is privately owned or publicly owned.
Here are some key considerations:
Privately
Owned:
1.
Concentration of Power: When a platform like Twitter is
privately owned, all decision-making authority rests with the owners or the
company's leadership. This concentration of power can lead to concerns about
accountability, transparency, and potential biases in content moderation and
platform policies.
2.
Profit Motive: Private ownership often means the primary goal of
the company is to generate profit for its owners or shareholders. This can
impact the platform's priorities and decision-making, as profit considerations
may take precedence over other social or public interest concerns.
3.
User Rights and Control: Private ownership gives the company
significant control over user data and platform policies. This can raise
concerns about privacy, data security, and censorship. The company may have the
discretion to enforce certain rules and restrictions on user behavior,
potentially affecting freedom of speech and expression.
4.
Innovation and Responsiveness: Privately owned platforms may be
more agile and responsive to market demands, allowing them to innovate and
adapt quickly. However, their actions may be driven by profit motives rather
than broader social or public interests.
Publicly
Owned:
1.
Public Accountability: Publicly owned platforms may be subject
to greater scrutiny and accountability, as they are answerable to a wider range
of stakeholders, including government bodies, regulatory authorities, and the
general public. This accountability can help ensure more transparent
decision-making and protection of user rights.
2.
Democratic Participation: Public ownership may provide
opportunities for more democratic participation in platform governance.
Publicly owned platforms could potentially involve users, experts, and public
representatives in decision-making processes, fostering diverse perspectives
and collective decision-making.
3.
Public Interest Focus: Publicly owned platforms can prioritize
public interest goals and societal well-being over short-term profit motives.
This could include considerations such as promoting freedom of expression,
addressing misinformation, and protecting user privacy, with a greater emphasis
on the common good.
4.
Potential for Political Influence: Public ownership can
introduce political dynamics and government influence into platform operations.
This may raise concerns about political interference, censorship, or biased
content moderation decisions. Striking the right balance between independence
and government oversight is crucial.
It is
important to note that the actual social implications can vary depending on
various factors, such as the specific ownership structure, legal frameworks,
and the company's approach to governance and decision-making.
Food Price Inflation
Notes Today:
The U.S. self-reported
rate of mental health distress is similar to Canada’s (27%) and Sweden’s (24%).
And yet… Annual gun homicides: Canada: 300 Sweden: 60 United States: 15,500
It’s the guns.
Meanwhile: Texas has banned more books than *any* state in America.
US debt to US GDP ratio = Problematic Zone..
Now this from ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer):
There are several ways that a country can lower its debt to GDP ratio: Increase economic growth: When a country's economy grows, its GDP increases, which can help to reduce the debt to GDP ratio. This can be achieved through measures such as increasing productivity, investing in infrastructure, and promoting trade.
Reduce government spending: By reducing government spending, a country can reduce the amount of debt it accumulates and improve its debt to GDP ratio. This can be achieved through measures such as cutting back on unnecessary programs, reducing waste, and streamlining government operations.
Increase tax revenue: By increasing tax revenue, a country can reduce its reliance on borrowing and improve its debt to GDP ratio. This can be achieved through measures such as increasing tax rates, broadening the tax base, and cracking down on tax evasion.
Sell assets: Another way to reduce debt is to sell government assets such as land, buildings, and state-owned companies. This can generate revenue that can be used to pay down debt and improve the debt to GDP ratio.
It is important to note that reducing the debt to GDP ratio often requires a combination of these measures, as well as other structural reforms aimed at promoting long-term economic growth and stability. Additionally, the specific strategies used to address debt and fiscal policy will depend on a country's unique circumstances and political context.